Look, if you can't derive happiness from even two strains of cancer cells being selectively killed off, (without proof of it not working on others) I suspect there is little to derive happiness from. Let's be enthusiastic about this eh?
Look, it's not 2 "strains" of cancer. You don't "catch" these particular "strains" of cancer from someone else like you do with bacteria or viruses. Everyone's cancer is unique to that individual. It's unlikely that someone with breast cancer will have the SAME EXACT mutations as those that spawned the specific cell lines used in the experiment. Plus, No one knows how well these immortal cell lines, grown for generations in petri dishes, correlate with the original cancer in a person. And all they've done so far are some mouse experiments. It's still FAR away and a shitton of money and work required before it can work in people, maaybe. Don't hold your breath.
And again, if this was something to get enthusiastic about, it wouldn't be in the journal "Breast Cancer Research".
I have a hard time understanding how gutting an animal alive and then frying it is ok in anyones culture. It would of been just as fresh if it had been quickly killed right at the start.
>> ^erikwdavis: @jimnms: are you under the impression that cops routinely, or even in exceptional cases, face situations where 50 out of 100 people in a public situation are randomly armed and looking to kill a police officer? You've never spoken to a cop, have you?
The vast majority of officers are never required to fire their weapon ONCE in the line of duty. During their entire careers. Which is as it should be. Police firings, let alone murders of citizens, let alone murders of non-criminal, unarmed civilians, is unusual in all sorts of ways, and that is why civilian review boards are called for when a particular PD has a nasty habit of shooting such citizens almost exclusively when they are black.
police officers are not military soldiers. If you aren't aware of the difference, you're probably not qualified to be taken seriously.
I never said he would face all 100 targets at the same time, and I have two relatives and a friend who are cops. A cop will have to make the decision whether or not to draw his/her weapon more than 100 times in their career. Michael Moore does not to have to make that decision, but he's quick to criticize those who do.
I don't know if racism played a roll in any of these shootings, I wasn't there, but I think the racism card is played way too much. It's like the story of the boy who called wolf.
"We Got Any Nickelback Fans Here?" - Chad Loses It
Because the members of Nickelback love to get stoned.
Kirk Cameron is on a Crusade to Debunk Evolution
Emoticons (Sift Talk Post)
I suppose
*promote
Sidney the Baby Otter Playing Around
demon_ix
Well, no wonder you don't like the bastard!
Teeny Little Super Guy!
Gabelstaplerfahrer Klaus: German Forklift Driver
Self Healing Bio-Concrete
They love to live and grow in extreme conditions. Like your lungs.
Our lungs are an awesome place for things to grow. It's hot, wet, and oxygen rich. That's why so many infectious bacteria love to live there.
Cancer Breakthrough. Believe It.
In reply to this comment by mentality:
Look, if you can't derive happiness from even two strains of cancer cells being selectively killed off, (without proof of it not working on others) I suspect there is little to derive happiness from. Let's be enthusiastic about this eh?
Look, it's not 2 "strains" of cancer. You don't "catch" these particular "strains" of cancer from someone else like you do with bacteria or viruses. Everyone's cancer is unique to that individual. It's unlikely that someone with breast cancer will have the SAME EXACT mutations as those that spawned the specific cell lines used in the experiment. Plus, No one knows how well these immortal cell lines, grown for generations in petri dishes, correlate with the original cancer in a person. And all they've done so far are some mouse experiments. It's still FAR away and a shitton of money and work required before it can work in people, maaybe. Don't hold your breath.
And again, if this was something to get enthusiastic about, it wouldn't be in the journal "Breast Cancer Research".
National Geographic Explorer-Inside LSD
Speed Cooking- serving live snake and fish
Eddie Izzard - Evolution vs. Intelligent Design (2009)
The face he makes at 12:58 is PRICELESS! SO hilarious.
I'd have to say that I enjoy 12:25 more...
SpatSolver - The Answer to all Arguments
Amazing Sign dance! :59sec
CUNt PUNCH
This guy has more upper body strength than you
Doctor Blu
Future from the Past -- 1993 AT&T "You Will" Ads
Michael Moore Helps the NYPD Distinguish Wallets from Guns
@jimnms: are you under the impression that cops routinely, or even in exceptional cases, face situations where 50 out of 100 people in a public situation are randomly armed and looking to kill a police officer? You've never spoken to a cop, have you?
The vast majority of officers are never required to fire their weapon ONCE in the line of duty. During their entire careers. Which is as it should be. Police firings, let alone murders of citizens, let alone murders of non-criminal, unarmed civilians, is unusual in all sorts of ways, and that is why civilian review boards are called for when a particular PD has a nasty habit of shooting such citizens almost exclusively when they are black.
police officers are not military soldiers. If you aren't aware of the difference, you're probably not qualified to be taken seriously.
I never said he would face all 100 targets at the same time, and I have two relatives and a friend who are cops. A cop will have to make the decision whether or not to draw his/her weapon more than 100 times in their career. Michael Moore does not to have to make that decision, but he's quick to criticize those who do.
I don't know if racism played a roll in any of these shootings, I wasn't there, but I think the racism card is played way too much. It's like the story of the boy who called wolf.
Spacious Thoughts by Tom Waits + Kool Keith